[cvsnt] Feature request: Commitable tags
Tony Hoyle
tmh at nodomain.org
Mon Apr 28 14:05:16 BST 2003
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 15:47:10 +0300, Tuomas Huhtanen
<tuomas.huhtanen at vertex.fi> wrote:
>But as Tony suggested, the -f might work for you in this case. The only
>thing is that once you have checked it out with some branch, it stays
>there unless you take a clean checkout again. So if for example you have
> created a branched document, check it out, then later modify the main
>document so that there is no need for the branch doc, the -f scheme
>would not work. The writable tag would recover that situation just fine.
No it wouldn't - once you've branched you can't 'un branch' because that would
be changing history.
>One other situation where the -f would not be sufficient is that if you
>need multiple levels of branches. Again, the writable tags would handle
>that without a problem.
Similarly they wouldn't - they would have to point to a single branch
revision, which means you'd need different tags for each branch.
Tony
More information about the cvsnt
mailing list