[cvsnt] Re: Thoughts on version numbering

[Tony Hoyle]

Ian Epperson wrote:

> Perhaps to avoid possible future muddling of the CVS versioning, CVSNT
> versioning should start at something much higher than 2.  Perhaps jumping
> to
> 10.x?  Or perhaps 4.x to hint at NT4?

Or 2003...  It can get silly once you start down that road :-)

I don't expect Unix CVS to reach 2.0 for quite a long time, so I'm not too
worried at the moment.

> Though I suppose CVSNT might be seen as a next generation of CVS and the
> 2.x nomenclature might be appropriate...?

At one point I considered changing the name to CVSNG, but chickened out :-)

Tony