Fork? (was RE: [cvsnt] crash in 2.0.58d, ideas about save crashdump feature)

[Czarnowski, Aric]

> Would there be any interest in / support for
> a fork of CVSNT that was intended to implement
> 'convenience' features such as these, 

No.  One feature issue like the crash dump behavior is not a good reason
to take on the very high responsibility of a fork.  There are so many
dead projects in SourceForge as examples, lets not plant another tree
just yet.

If the feature is important enough and you feel you can run a fork grab
the sources and implement the change, run it in your production
environment until it's stable and then let Tony know about it and
provide a patch for his input.  If it still goes nowhere and you've
proven at least through the above then *think hard* about forking.

--Aric

Aric Czarnowski
Unimax Systems Corporation
612-204-3634