[cvsnt] Re: Purge file history because of user CVS utilisation error...

[Aaron Kynaston]

Wow - binary deltas?  Is that in place in the current revision now, or
is it comming up?  That would be dang cool . .

Thanks for the info.

>>> Tony Hoyle <tmh at nodomain.org> 12/21/2004 4:55:44 PM >>>
Aaron Kynaston wrote:
> I've had a few times where I've had a small set of larger library
files
> that didn't make sense to keep a version, but I still wanted them
under
> a tag - it was frustrating to be wasting the extra space . .I
understand
> space is cheap these days, but my point is that I wanted CVS to be
in
> control of them, but still give me the benefit of storing it under a
> tag, and know that any future changes to those files would only be
> maintained at the latest revision of the file. . .

That's rather hard to do, as you have to maintain both the head of
every 
   branch and version for every branchpoint just to keep an RCS file 
coherent.  It'd be a fairly difficult thing to implement and get
right.

Binary deltas help a little, although they're far from perfect (I 
suspect the algorithm needs some tweaking anyway, as the resultant file

size has crept up over time as I've fixed stuff).

Keeping a completely unversioned file could be done, although you'd
lose 
tags/branch support.

> It sounds like this was something in CVSNT before, why was it
removed?

There's never been anything like it in CVSNT.

Tony
_______________________________________________
cvsnt mailing list
cvsnt at cvsnt.org 
http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt