[cvsnt] Strange behaviour of cvs update -C -j
Glen Starrett
grstarrett at cox.net
Mon Jan 5 18:04:10 GMT 2004
> When I do cvs update -C -j HEAD <file> the file is made
> read-only. The -j
> HEAD can be omitted altogether, but still I wonder why the
> file is made
> read-only?
I had a similar problem with the cvs up -j behavior, bringing in new files
as read-only. Was this a new file to the branch, or one that existed on the
branch already? (I'm assuming that you are on a branch here).
Glen Starrett
More information about the cvsnt
mailing list