[cvsnt] Re: Enforcing Reserved Edits

[Tony Hoyle]

Oliver Giesen wrote:

> No. CVSNT doesn't make a distinction between regular and reserved edits 
> (yet?). For instance a reserved edit will also fail even when someone 
> else "only" has an unreserved edit on a file. IIRC it also works against 
> a non-CVSNT server. If I'm not entirely mistaken, the difference between 
> the two is purely client-side. To the server, a Reserved Edit probably 
> looks the same as if the client first did an cvs editors and then cvs 
> edit. Correct, Tony?
> 
IIRC that's how it's implemented.  There aren't two kinds of edit, just 
the option to check for an edit before a commit/edit.

Tony