[cvsnt] Re: cvs info missing :local: protocol

[Tony Hoyle]

On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:09:00 +0200, Oliver Giesen <ogware at gmx.net>
wrote:


>
>Yes, that's exactly what the talk is about. The question is _who_ should 
>assume it (this assumption is something that has to be explicitly 
>coded): CVSNT or WinCvs?
>
It's doable... just hardcode a bunch of print statements to cover the
local protocol.  

Might be a few days - not much chance to work on the code at the
moment (can't snatch any time at work as there's no remote connection
to the repository at the moment).

Tony