[cvsnt] Re: Performance Woes...
Glen Starrett
grstarrett at cox.net
Wed Jun 8 18:48:53 BST 2005
Jeremy Weber wrote:
> On Drive 1:
> - Windows 2003 Standard Server - Nothing installed/running but CVS.
> - CVSNT - CVS Version: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.10.8
> (client/server).
> - 2 Xeon 2.8, 2 GB RAM, 1 SATA 7200rpm 80 GB Drive
> On Drive 2:
> - RedHat Enterprise 4.0
> - CVS - Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.11.17 (client/server)
> - 2 Xeon 2.8, 2 GB RAM, 1 SATA 7200rpm 80 GB Drive
CVSNT also runs on Linux -- why don't you try running the same version
of CVSNT on the RHEL so you get comparable features running. You'll
likely note that Win32 file system access is significantly slower (just
my impression that it is, even without realtime scanners -- your tests
seem to confirm this anecdotally anyway).
I have no idea why Win runs faster with the supposedly performance
increasing features off...
Regards,
--
Glen Starrett
More information about the cvsnt
mailing list