[cvsnt] BUG: Corrupted binary files

[Tony Hoyle]

Kevin wrote:
> By the way the files we are dealing with were *removed* on the HEAD version
> but are still alive on the branch.

That could have been the same issue since everything is related to HEAD 
(although I'm not sure it could have manifested itself in that way.. not 
really keen on reintroducing the bug to find out!).

> I can hand you a problematic file that you may take a look at and the
> 'original' file that was committed, should I attach it to the mailing list?
> The file at the tip of the branch is not the same as the committed file.

It's better to see if you can repeat the problem with a recent build and 
produce a script.  If the file was corrupted by the old issue then 
there's not a lot of point in testing with it.

Tony