[cvsnt] Re: Has the format of CVS Entries file changed in CVSNT > 2.0.51d?
Tony Hoyle
tmh at nodomain.org
Tue Mar 22 17:58:55 GMT 2005
M. wrote:
> Also, am I right in assuming 1) on the server side, that CVSNT server
> repository formats are not backward compatible, so that once upgraded by
> use of a more recent version of CVSNT, there is no going back to an
> earlier version (2.0.51d in my case),
Basically, although you might get away with it depending on which
features you use.
and 2) on the client sandbox side,
> that one cannot and should not mix earlier and later clients in the same
> sandbox? (The earlier one used by the editor, so as not to confuse it,
> and the later client used for the new features.)
You can mix them, provided you stick to options that are common to both
- eg. don't used the 'alternative' CVSROOT options, don't use -k options
that aren't supported by both, etc.
The CVS/Entries is the same - all the new stuff is in CVS/Entries.Extra
You might have issues with edit/unedit across multiple clients as cvsnt
doesn't store them in quite the same way (because we have per-branch
edits now). If you're just working concurrently though this isn't an issue.
Tony
More information about the cvsnt
mailing list