[cvsnt] Re: In case anyone cares

[Glen Starrett]

Josh Skains wrote:
> We found GNU CVS on a Linux box using twin P3 500mhz to be roughly 50%
> faster than CVSNT on Win2k using twin 1.8ghz Xeon.
> 
> That's just plan sad...

How about GNU CVS running on Win2K, or CVSNT on the Linux box?  The Win 
OS has so much crap sandbagging performance normally that it's extremely 
misleading to do such a comparison.  That said, CVSNT is doing a lot 
more (e.g. using system authentication and reverse DNS is going to be a 
LOT slower than a file lookup and IP addresses only)


-- 
Glen Starrett