[cvsnt] Re: Alert: Binary files are corrupted when you do a cvsremove

[Bo Berglund]

There might be a case for installing Roundup instead.
Much smaller footprint and easier to use, but perhaps not feature-rich enough?

We have used Roundup ourselves for about a year and a half now and it seems
pretty solid. But then again I am no expert in bug databases etc...

/Bo

-----Original Message-----
From: cvsnt-bounces at cvsnt.org [mailto:cvsnt-bounces at cvsnt.org]On Behalf
Of Glen Starrett
Sent: den 11 maj 2005 17:52
To: cvsnt at cvsnt.org
Subject: [cvsnt] Re: Alert: Binary files are corrupted when you do a
cvsremove


Gerhard Fiedler wrote:
> Is there a public bugtracker or something for cvsnt? For some time, I've
> been reluctant to install newer versions, because the only place where the
> shortcomings of individual versions seems to be published is on this list,
> and that happens of course not in a very well organized form. I'd have to
> follow the list closely and create my own bugtracker database from this.
> 
> It would be a help for many probably (including the developers) to know
> what version has/had what problems, to be able to decide to which version
> it may make sense to update. 

There used to be a bugzilla then a Mantis bug database, but after the 
last time Tony had problems with MySQL (??) he decided to stop using it. 
  I think he said something to the effect that this list was easier for 
him to work from, but don't quote me on that.


-- 
Glen Starrett
_______________________________________________
cvsnt mailing list
cvsnt at cvsnt.org
http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt