[cvsnt] Re: CVSNT and Subversion comparison

[Luigi D. Sandon]

> It's linked in http://www.cvsnt.org/wiki/Download, which could probably 
> be better advertised but is linked from the main wiki page.

Some redesign of the links would be welcome. For example when one clicks 
   the "History page" link at "http://www.cvsnt.com/cvspro/" is not sent 
to the latest one, but to the wiki (with a different interface) where a 
line tell the page has been moved - to another site - a blog (with 
another interface). Maybe that list should be hosted in the main site, 
and easily accessible, and looking to be a "whole". I understand is a 
secondary issue, but to a user Subversion "looks" to be developed more 
"professionaly".

> Glen's idea sounds useful if I can find a good implementation of it.

Any program that allows for a searchable categorized list will do. I 
would use a simple bug tracking application anonymous users can only 
browse. At least it could be searched to see if a bug is known, what 
releases are affected, and when it was (or will be fixed), and if any 
workaround is available. If a confirmed bug gets a unique ID, it would 
be easier to rfer to it in this list too, instead of referring to it as 
"the bug that..." :)

If you keep an internal database you could find a way to "publish" bugs 
to the "external" database when right to do so.

   Luigi Sandon