[cvsnt] CVSNT gets more and more unstable (too much releases)
Bernhard Merkle
nospm-news at merkleonline.de
Mon May 23 08:03:34 BST 2005
Eclipse and others are using bugzilla (or what ever you want) perfectly
and are open source. You get lower noise, because it is more work to
write a real bug report that to write a e-mail/news posting.
Later, searching and finding certain bugs is much more easier than to
search a news-archive. Why do we have databases ? You can see the status
of the bug, the discussion etc etc. If you are using news/mail this is
too weak. Please look at this thread. It already has been split too much
(someone even started a new thread, because of his mailer/newsreader).
I think i is just inefficient.
Tony Hoyle wrote:
> Gerhard Fiedler wrote:
>
>>
>> You're probably talking about the noise in a bug database with public
>> report access. That's really sad, because one would think that open
>> source
>> would actually make this easier, with having many more reporters.
>
>
> You have more reporters but even after filtering out the noise, many of
> them never respond - I lost count of the number of bugs I had to close
> because I couldn't replicate and the reporter never responded to
> requests for more information. Some (perhaps many) of these will have
> been genuine issues.
>
> It's perfectly understandable really.. the people reporting have real
> jobs, and they're just motivated to report a bug because something
> didn't work for them.. they're not professional testers or anything.
>
> In a closed system like a company the reporter is normally either a
> tester, who's job it is to give good bug reports, or someone who you can
> walk over to and ask. It's much easier that way.
>
> Tony
More information about the cvsnt
mailing list