[cvsnt] Re: CVSNT 2.0.58d CPU performance problems and thelockserver

[dzielke at aep.com]

Not ignored, at least not in my case.  I can't speak for the others but I 
haven't experienced any performance issues (even though our "server" is a 
1.0 GHz desktop) so I haven't had much reason to comment.  Please don't 
interpret a lack of answers as you are being ignored.

As others have mentioned, they might not be able to reproduce the problem.

Thanks,
Don Zielke
American Electric Power
Direct (614) 583-6337
Audinet 8-220-6337
Email dzielke (at) aep.com
---
KForce Professional Staffing
501 W. Schrock Road Suite 207
Westerville, OH 43081




Stéphane Nicoll <Stephane.Nicoll at bsb.com>
Sent by: cvsnt-bounces at cvsnt.org
05/25/2005 04:02 AM

 
        To:     <cvsnt at cvsnt.org>
        cc: 
        Subject:        RE: [cvsnt] Re: CVSNT 2.0.58d CPU performance problems and thelockserver


Why do I have the feeling that this problem is being ignored by the CVSNT 
guru(s)?


-----Original Message-----
From: Stéphane Nicoll 
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 12:10 PM
To: 'cvsnt at cvsnt.org'
Subject: [cvsnt] Re: CVSNT 2.0.58d CPU performance problems and the 
lockserver


Hello list,
 
Edward Patterson wrote:
>    We are currently running into performance issues with CVSNT. Even 
> with the AV turned off on the repository directory and the reverse DNS 
> lookup disabled the performance hit after 4 or more cvs.exe processes 
> run on the server the CPU is pegged at close to 98 to 100%. WE tried 
> upgrading to a better machine with a dual, multi-threaded Pentium 4 
> processor. With up to 10 cvs.exe processes running on the machine the 
> CPU is at 85% but the majority of the CPU is held up by the lockserver 
> process. I find it hard to believe that CVSNT server can only support 
> less then 10 concurrent users at one time. I have scoured the internet 
> for possible performance issues but there is not much out there. 
> Anyone else running into this issue? Any help would be greatly 
> appreciated, thanks


I've seen this thread and we do have the same problem running CVSNT 
2.0.51d. AV is not the issue here since we monitor disk activites and idle 
time is almost 100%. The locking service is consuming 50% with an HT 
processor (I assume it's 100% in this case). A single checkout is *very* 
slow (only one CVS session).

So what's wrong here? Upgrading is not an option: last time I tried, some 
files from our repository dissapeared.

Thanks,
Stéphane



_______________________________________________
cvsnt mailing list
cvsnt at cvsnt.org
http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt