[cvsnt] Re: CVSNT 2.6 database engine?

[Flávio Etrusco]

> >
> >At the moment all the data is in the RCS files.. it'll end up in the
> >database in the 3.0 timeframe...
> (...). Keeping the admin data in the database would probably get
> rid of all that speed problem. Could you not store the binaries in the
> file system with pointers in the database?

Hopefully at the time 'git' will "ready enough" to be used for data storage :-)

> >
> >* In actual fact these may be the same physical database - especially in
> >oracle where it's a royal pain in the ass to create new ones...
>
> Really simple to do with MSSQL :-)
>

It isn't too much difficult to create separate schemas at least :-)

-Etrusco