[cvsnt] Re: corruption of binary files on checkout

[Tony Hoyle]

Bo Berglund wrote:

> Then again 2.0.51d is not a supported version, it had issues already
> when it was current.
>
Yes I wouldn't like to vouch for the stability of anything less than 
2.0.58... As I remember it 2.0.51 had a number of issues at the time, 
and it wouldn't surprise me if it wasn't passing the correct information 
on import (even 2.0.58 isn't officially supported any more, but it was 
the most stable of the 2.0 series so is a good reference point).

Tony