[cvsnt] Re: How to get rid of protocols

[Glen Starrett]

Gerhard Fiedler wrote:
> Then there's Glen's comment about a possible difference between the info
> output and the actually available protocols (under *ix). I'm running cvsnt
> on a Win2k Pro system -- can I assume that the info output shows me what is
> actually available? Or is it safer to use the older method of renaming or
> deleting the protocol DLLs?

You could just try it to find out.  If you do a "cvs -d 
:pserver:username at server:/repos login" and get a successful login then 
you know the protocol is active.

Renaming the DLL is less convenient but will absolutely work.

Regards,

-- 
Glen Starrett