[cvsnt] -kB option problematic?

[Gerhard Fiedler]

Tony Hoyle wrote:

>> FWIW, it seems to be possible to destroy earlier revisions by deleting
>> later revisions. Not sure how that happens, but something like this
>> should "work": 
>> 
> It's not really surprising - you've crossed a boundary between different 
> storage types.  

What I found surprising is that it doesn't work but is allowed. Shouldn't a
command that doesn't work (like deleting a revision that changes the
storage type) be caught and rejected?

Gerhard