[cvsnt] Re: Problem wit binary files after upgrading server from 2.5.01.1976 to 2.5.03.2151

[Tony Hoyle]

Daniel Lapolla wrote:

> Could you provide (or point where we can find) the library versions 
> (used by CVSNT) of your reference configuration so we can compare it 
> with our system?
>
If you're just talking about redhat, it's built on a stock redhat 9 install.

The RPM is also tested periodically against RHEL4 to make sure nothing 
has changed (RHEL has a set of compatibility libraries so it rarely 
presents a problem).

The primary unix build environment is running debian stable, and each 
build is tested and run on OSX 10.4, Solaris 9 (builds are done on 8 but 
no extra testing normally), and HPUX 11.11i.  Internal builds are also 
tested on Tru64 (this is a nontrivial install so not recommended though).

Fedora is untested although I believe some have got it to run using the 
standard RPMs.  Ditto for SuSE.

On the Windows side, it's built on XP 64 and 32bit machines and tested 
on Win2000, XP, Win2003.  NT4 and Win95 are believed to work but no more 
testing is done with them (Win95 is being phased out starting with the 
2.6 builds).

Tony