[cvsnt] "unofficial" bug report

[Arthur Barrett]

Serge,

> So please accept the following "unofficial" bug report:
> The problem is that after update/merge of conflicting file, 
> the file was left with RO attribute and conflict editor could 
> not handle this. Previous version opened conflicting files for 
> writing.

Submitting this report twice does not make it any more legible.
Submitting it under the subject "Re: [cvsnt] Re: CVSNT does not support
*large* binary files(crashesonthem)" also doesn't make it any more
legible.

I (any I suspect everyone else on the list) updates/merges quite often
and I certainly don't see files becoming read-only after a merge.
You'll need to list the actual commands, actual client and server
versions, CVSROOT, trace of the "cvs update" (ie: "cvs -ttt update" with
server side tracing enabled) and also list the "cvs status" of the file
before and after the trace.

And choose a relavent subject line.

Regards,


Arthur Barrett