[cvsnt] Re: Migrate From CVS-1.11.18 patched by CVSACL-1.2.2

[Arthur Barrett]

Cheok,


1. start a new thread with an appropriate subject
2. search the newsgroup archive
3. check the faq:
http://march-hare.com/cvspro/faq/
4. do a trace (cvs -ttt log) and look at the times and see what
operation is using up the time.

CVSNT is a much bigger product than CVS, so chances are it'll be
somewhat slower - how much slower depends on the features you choose to
use.

Regards,


Arthur Barrett

-----Original Message-----
From: Cheok Yan Cheng [mailto:yccheok at yahoo.com] 
Sent: Monday, 20 March 2006 8:02 PM
To: Arthur Barrett; cvsnt at cvsnt.org
Subject: RE: [cvsnt] Re: Migrate From CVS-1.11.18 patched by
CVSACL-1.2.2


This evening I did a quick setup of CVSNT on my Linux
Ubuntu machine. The first impression of me on CVSNT
is, "its operation is extremly slow compared with
CVS".

I am using tortoiseCVS as client tool. For example, in
order for the revision graph to pop up:

CVS - 1.8 seconds
CVSNT - 6.4 seconds

For other operation like commit, update special...
they are also slower than the CVS i use previously.

Most probably I am doing something wrong. Any hint for
me to fix the problem?

Thank you very much!

cheok

--- Arthur Barrett <arthur.barrett at march-hare.com>
wrote:

> Also remember to set the aclmode= in the
> CVSROOT/config file, I don't
> know which mode is the most "compatible" for you.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> Arthur
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cvsnt-bounces at cvsnt.org [mailto:cvsnt-bounces at cvsnt.org] On 
> Behalf Of Cheok Yan Cheng
> Sent: Sunday, 19 March 2006 6:17 AM
> To: cvsnt at cvsnt.org
> Subject: [cvsnt] Re: Migrate From CVS-1.11.18
> patched by CVSACL-1.2.2
> 
> 
> AFAIK, CVSACL stores its permission information in
> .access files in each directory across the
> repository,
> not into the RCS files themselves. So the repository
> itself should be fully compatible. Someone could
> write
> a
> script to convert from .access to the xml format
> used
> by CVSNT, but unless the access rules are too
> complex,
> it should be easier to define them again using
> chacl/rchacl.
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thank you. I think what I will do is just reuse all
> the old CVS repository, except the CVSROOT folder,
> which will be re-initialized by CVSNT itself. After
> that, I will re-define the permission access by
> hand.
> Hopefully this can work smoothly ;)
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> _______________________________________________
> cvsnt mailing list
> cvsnt at cvsnt.org
> http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com