[cvsnt] Re: Bad upgrade experience to current CVSNT 2.50.3 (2260)

[Tony Hoyle]

John Peacock wrote:
> Tony Hoyle wrote:
>> Also, it's not really a required DLL.  It's only ever used to produce 
>> crashdumps.. it's good to have it around but not having it is hardly 
>> fatal.
> 
> I define required as "the program runs with this file present and 
> doesn't work if the file is absent" which was the experience I had...
> 
It works fine without it - most of my NT4 tests were run on a machine 
without this file present.

Tony