[cvsnt] Re: Bad upgrade experience to current CVSNT 2.50.3 (2260)
John Peacock
jpeacock at rowman.com
Fri Mar 24 20:12:11 GMT 2006
Tony Hoyle wrote:
> John Peacock wrote:
>> I define required as "the program runs with this file present and
>> doesn't work if the file is absent" which was the experience I had...
>
> To be more constructive: What actually failed? And can you clarify
> that we are talking about dbghelp.dll (which we use, loaded as part of
> the exception handle) not dbghlp.dll (which we don't use or have any use
> for).
Sorry, dbghlp.dll was a typo on my part.
If I rename DbgHelp.dll and run 'cvs --version' I get a requester titled
"Unable to Locate DLL" with a listing of my path statement. I get no
other output whatsoever (which I why I assume that cvs is broken without
this DLL).
This may only be a problem on NT...
John
More information about the cvsnt
mailing list