[cvsnt] Mergepoint issues on 2.5.0.3 b2382

[Tony Hoyle]

Richard Wirth wrote:
> No that's not the way the code works!
> The patched Version (bidirectional mergepoints) will do
> 
>  diff(1.2:1.1.2.3)->>1.3
> 
> so there is no data lost (at least in this very simple example) but
> avoidable conflicts are ommited.
>
That's wrong - 1.2 is not the common ancestor.  What that creates is 
essentially a copy of the branch onto HEAD not a merge.

Tony