[cvsnt] Problem using binary option -kB
Fabrice PUBILIER
fabrice.pubilier at atosorigin.com
Thu May 3 09:16:01 BST 2007
Thanks for your answer.
I guess it's something that should be written in the cvsnt -B option to warn
users IMO.
We're using CVSNT on a big Excel File that is modified about 130 times a
month, and with the requirement to keep a 3 months history...
That's definitly not a good way to use CVS but I'm trying to deal with what
I get in our Project Managment and I tried to lower the growing size using
the optimized algorithm, I should have stayed with the old -kb tough!
Regards,
Fabrice Pubilier
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Arthur Barrett [mailto:arthur.barrett at march-hare.com]
> Envoyé : mercredi 2 mai 2007 23:24
> À : fabrice.pubilier at atosorigin.com; cvsnt at cvsnt.org
> Objet : RE: [cvsnt] Problem using binary option -kB
>
> Fabrice,
>
> I don't recommend the use of cvs admin -o, and definitely not
> with -kB...
>
> I can understand you needing to free up some space with -kb
> revisions, but -kB revisions should be small enough (and disk
> space cheap enough) that it is no longer required to remove revisions.
>
> In short: if you are going to use cvs admin -o, use -kb, if
> you want to avoid cvs admin -o, use -kB.
>
> You've probably found a bug, but due to the above reasons
> it's unlikely that anyone on the commercial side are going to
> spend time trying to fix it in the near future - but of
> course you (or anyone else) can checkout the sources and fix
> it and submit a patch to cvsnt-dev which we'll gladly put
> into the next build.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Arthur Barrett
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cvsnt-bounces at cvsnt.org on behalf of Fabrice PUBILIER
> Sent: Thu 5/3/2007 3:38 AM
> To: cvsnt at cvsnt.org
> Cc:
> Subject: [cvsnt] Problem using binary option -kB
>
>
> Hi,
> I have some binaries on a repository that I monthly clean-up
> removing revisions between tags, I use the command:
> cvs admin -o Begin:End
> I recently discovered that the binaries are not correctly
> patched anymore since I posted them with the -kB option
> instead of -kb, so I made a few
> tests:
>
> Here is the configuration with my tests
> Client: Concurrent Versions System (CVSNT) 2.5.03 (Scorpio) Build 2260
> (client/server)
> Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVSNT) 2.5.03 (Scorpio) Build 2382
> (client/server)
>
> - FilePostedUsing-kB ==>
> cvs -z9 -w admin -o 1.5 -- "FilePostedUsing-kB" (in directory
> C:\Dev_CdS\TestsCVSNT\)
> RCS file:
> /services/Repository_CVS/CelluleGC/TestsCVSNT/FilePostedUsing-kB.xls,v
> cvs admin: inflate: invalid distance too far back cvs [admin
> aborted]: reading from server: Input/output error
>
> - FilePostedUsing-kb ==> Ok with binaries removal and no
> problem to get back old posts before the deleted revisions.
>
> Is there any problem with the new algorithm to compress binaries?
>
>
> For instance on my production repository here is my configuration:
> Client: Concurrent Versions System (CVSNT) 2.0.51d (client/server)
> Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVSNT) 2.0.26 (client/server)
>
> I manage to remove revisions in both case (-kb end -kB) but
> the -kB operation render old revision unpatchable:
> When I try to get an old revision before some deleted ones
> here is what I
> get:
> cvs [server aborted]: Binary patch failed
>
> Any help would be welcome,
> Regards,
> Fabrice.
> Atos Origin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cvsnt mailing list
> cvsnt at cvsnt.org
> http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt
>
>
>
More information about the cvsnt
mailing list