[cvsnt] CVS v. CVSNT

[Oliver Giesen]

Tony Hoyle wrote:

>>that CVSNT has implemented in the same time. Yet the CVSNT docs are only 
>>behind current development a few weeks or so. Strange, considering how 
>>many people are behind GNU CVS while CVSNT is basically maintained by a 
>>single person. Kudos to Tony!
> 
> I'm flattered, but my documentation skills aren't that good... I know
> there are serious holes in the docs as they stand (getting better as
> docbook is very easy to work with) and I'm not really satisfied with
> them at the moment.

OK, if it makes you feel less flattered, I'll say the Kudos were for the 
overall effort, not specifically for the docs. Most of all I was 
comparing the up-to-dateness of the CVSNT docs with that of the GNU CVS 
docs, even though I just had another look to make sure and it doesn't 
seem to be as bad anymore as it was when I last checked...

Still, ... :)

Cheers,

-- 
Oliver
----	------------------
JID:	ogiesen at jabber.org
ICQ:	18777742	(http://wwp.icq.com/18777742)