[cvsnt] CVS v. CVSNT

[Siegfried Heintze]

Since I just went thru hell because of some glaring problems with the
documentation (specifically the cvsnt chm file) perhaps I should volunteer
to correct them. What is involved with updating the documentation? I presume
the documents are stored in a CVSNT server somewhere and there is some build
procedure, maybe a makefile, for the chm? I've never used docbook, but I
think I have some tools from my cygwin installation.
  Siegfried

-----Original Message-----
From: cvsnt-bounces at cvsnt.org [mailto:cvsnt-bounces at cvsnt.org] On Behalf Of
Oliver Giesen
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 8:52 AM
To: cvsnt at cvsnt.org
Subject: Re: [cvsnt] CVS v. CVSNT

Tony Hoyle wrote:

>>that CVSNT has implemented in the same time. Yet the CVSNT docs are only 
>>behind current development a few weeks or so. Strange, considering how 
>>many people are behind GNU CVS while CVSNT is basically maintained by a 
>>single person. Kudos to Tony!
> 
> I'm flattered, but my documentation skills aren't that good... I know
> there are serious holes in the docs as they stand (getting better as
> docbook is very easy to work with) and I'm not really satisfied with
> them at the moment.

OK, if it makes you feel less flattered, I'll say the Kudos were for the 
overall effort, not specifically for the docs. Most of all I was 
comparing the up-to-dateness of the CVSNT docs with that of the GNU CVS 
docs, even though I just had another look to make sure and it doesn't 
seem to be as bad anymore as it was when I last checked...

Still, ... :)

Cheers,

-- 
Oliver
----	------------------
JID:	ogiesen at jabber.org
ICQ:	18777742	(http://wwp.icq.com/18777742)
_______________________________________________
cvsnt mailing list
cvsnt at cvsnt.org
http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt