[cvsnt] Re: Current best version... [Was CVSNT & File Permissions]
Tony Hoyle
tmh at nodomain.org
Thu Nov 18 15:00:51 GMT 2004
John Cole wrote:
> One thing I would like to add on this, as I'm one of those not quite willing
> to upgrade just yet :-), is that TortoiseCVS is currently shipping 51d and
> not 58d.
>
> Since we make extensive use of cvs acl's and those changed between these
> versions, we are sticking to pre 58d.
Makes sense... the new ACLs take a little getting used to (although
they're actually more consistent).
It was unfortunately impossible to make them compatible as it was a
change in the way that the ACLs processed (the old version is from some
pre-cvsnt patches although it'd been mostly rewritten - the new stuff
scales a lot better so shouldn't require any nasty upgrades in the future).
> I've always thought that the 'noise' level about a release on this list was
> a very good indicator as to how safe a new version has been :-) The noise
> about 58d has been going down steadily lately, so I'm hoping that the issues
> with that release have been worked through.
I think so. That's pretty much how I gauge it too... There will always
be problems for some, with so many users (I've seen the numbers, and
it's a lot higher than you'd guess by looking at the list..)
> Fortunately, my main cvs server (2.0.41a) is rock solid, and my hot spare
> (2.0.51b) is too, so I don't have any pressing need to upgrade.
Makes sense to me. If it works, don't worry about it...
Tony
More information about the cvsnt
mailing list